Django has support for writing asynchronous (“async”) views, along with an entirely async-enabled request stack if you are running under ASGI. Async views will still work under WSGI, but with performance penalties, and without the ability to have efficient long-running requests.
We’re still working on async support for the ORM and other parts of Django.
You can expect to see this in future releases. For now, you can use the
sync_to_async() adapter to interact with the sync parts of Django.
There is also a whole range of async-native Python libraries that you can
Any view can be declared async by making the callable part of it return a
coroutine - commonly, this is done using
async def. For a function-based
view, this means declaring the whole view using
async def. For a
class-based view, this means making its
__call__() method an
asyncio.iscoroutinefunction to test if your view is
asynchronous or not. If you implement your own method of returning a
coroutine, ensure you set the
_is_coroutine attribute of the view
asyncio.coroutines._is_coroutine so this function returns
Under a WSGI server, async views will run in their own, one-off event loop. This means you can use async features, like concurrent async HTTP requests, without any issues, but you will not get the benefits of an async stack.
The main benefits are the ability to service hundreds of connections without using Python threads. This allows you to use slow streaming, long-polling, and other exciting response types.
If you want to use these, you will need to deploy Django using ASGI instead.
You will only get the benefits of a fully-asynchronous request stack if you have no synchronous middleware loaded into your site. If there is a piece of synchronous middleware, then Django must use a thread per request to safely emulate a synchronous environment for it.
Middleware can be built to support both sync and async contexts. Some of Django’s middleware is built like
this, but not all. To see what middleware Django has to adapt, you can turn
on debug logging for the
django.request logger and look for log
messages about “Synchronous middleware … adapted”.
In both ASGI and WSGI mode, you can still safely use asynchronous support to run code concurrently rather than serially. This is especially handy when dealing with external APIs or data stores.
If you want to call a part of Django that is still synchronous, like the ORM,
you will need to wrap it in a
sync_to_async() call. For example:
from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async results = await sync_to_async(Blog.objects.get, thread_sensitive=True)(pk=123)
You may find it easier to move any ORM code into its own function and call that
entire function using
sync_to_async(). For example:
from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async def _get_blog(pk): return Blog.objects.select_related('author').get(pk=pk) get_blog = sync_to_async(_get_blog, thread_sensitive=True)
If you accidentally try to call a part of Django that is still synchronous-only from an async view, you will trigger Django’s asynchronous safety protection to protect your data from corruption.
When running in a mode that does not match the view (e.g. an async view under WSGI, or a traditional sync view under ASGI), Django must emulate the other call style to allow your code to run. This context-switch causes a small performance penalty of around a millisecond.
This is also true of middleware. Django will attempt to minimize the number of context-switches between sync and async. If you have an ASGI server, but all your middleware and views are synchronous, it will switch just once, before it enters the middleware stack.
However, if you put synchronous middleware between an ASGI server and an asynchronous view, it will have to switch into sync mode for the middleware and then back to async mode for the view. Django will also hold the sync thread open for middleware exception propagation. This may not be noticeable at first, but adding this penalty of one thread per request can remove any async performance advantage.
You should do your own performance testing to see what effect ASGI versus WSGI has on your code. In some cases, there may be a performance increase even for a purely synchronous codebase under ASGI because the request-handling code is still all running asynchronously. In general you will only want to enable ASGI mode if you have asynchronous code in your project.
Certain key parts of Django are not able to operate safely in an async environment, as they have global state that is not coroutine-aware. These parts of Django are classified as “async-unsafe”, and are protected from execution in an async environment. The ORM is the main example, but there are other parts that are also protected in this way.
If you try to run any of these parts from a thread where there is a running
event loop, you will get a
SynchronousOnlyOperation error. Note that you
don’t have to be inside an async function directly to have this error occur. If
you have called a sync function directly from an async function,
sync_to_async() or similar, then it can also occur. This is
because your code is still running in a thread with an active event loop, even
though it may not be declared as async code.
If you encounter this error, you should fix your code to not call the offending
code from an async context. Instead, write your code that talks to async-unsafe
functions in its own, sync function, and call that using
asgiref.sync.sync_to_async() (or any other way of running sync code in
its own thread).
The async context can be imposed upon you by the environment in which you are running your Django code. For example, Jupyter notebooks and IPython interactive shells both transparently provide an active event loop so that it is easier to interact with asynchronous APIs.
If you’re using an IPython shell, you can disable this event loop by running:
as a command at the IPython prompt. This will allow you to run synchronous code
errors; however, you also won’t be able to
await asynchronous APIs. To turn
the event loop back on, run:
If you’re in an environment other than IPython (or you can’t turn off
autoawait in IPython for some reason), you are certain there is no chance
of your code being run concurrently, and you absolutely need to run your sync
code from an async context, then you can disable the warning by setting the
DJANGO_ALLOW_ASYNC_UNSAFE environment variable to any value.
If you enable this option and there is concurrent access to the async-unsafe parts of Django, you may suffer data loss or corruption. Be very careful and do not use this in production environments.
If you need to do this from within Python, do that with
import os os.environ["DJANGO_ALLOW_ASYNC_UNSAFE"] = "true"
It is necessary to adapt the calling style when calling sync code from an async
context, or vice-versa. For this there are two adapter functions, from the
are used to transition between the calling styles while preserving
These adapter functions are widely used in Django. The asgiref package
itself is part of the Django project, and it is automatically installed as a
dependency when you install Django with
Takes an async function and returns a sync function that wraps it. Can be used as either a direct wrapper or a decorator:
from asgiref.sync import async_to_sync async def get_data(...): ... sync_get_data = async_to_sync(get_data) @async_to_sync async def get_other_data(...): ...
The async function is run in the event loop for the current thread, if one is present. If there is no current event loop, a new event loop is spun up specifically for the single async invocation and shut down again once it completes. In either situation, the async function will execute on a different thread to the calling code.
Threadlocals and contextvars values are preserved across the boundary in both directions.
async_to_sync() is essentially a more powerful version of the
asyncio.run() function in Python’s standard library. As well
as ensuring threadlocals work, it also enables the
thread_sensitive mode of
sync_to_async() when that wrapper is used below it.
Takes a sync function and returns an async function that wraps it. Can be used as either a direct wrapper or a decorator:
from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async async_function = sync_to_async(sync_function, thread_sensitive=False) async_function = sync_to_async(sensitive_sync_function, thread_sensitive=True) @sync_to_async def sync_function(...): ...
Threadlocals and contextvars values are preserved across the boundary in both directions.
Sync functions tend to be written assuming they all run in the main
sync_to_async() has two threading modes:
thread_sensitive=True (the default): the sync function will run in the
same thread as all other
thread_sensitive functions. This will be the
main thread, if the main thread is synchronous and you are using the
thread_sensitive=False: the sync function will run in a brand new thread
which is then closed once the invocation completes.
asgiref version 3.3.0 changed the default value of the
thread_sensitive parameter to
True. This is a safer default, and in
many cases interacting with Django the correct value, but be sure to
evaluate uses of
sync_to_async() if updating
asgiref from a prior
Thread-sensitive mode is quite special, and does a lot of work to run all
functions in the same thread. Note, though, that it relies on usage of
async_to_sync() above it in the stack to correctly run things on the
main thread. If you use
asyncio.run() or similar, it will fall back to
running thread-sensitive functions in a single, shared thread, but this will
not be the main thread.
The reason this is needed in Django is that many libraries, specifically database adapters, require that they are accessed in the same thread that they were created in. Also a lot of existing Django code assumes it all runs in the same thread, e.g. middleware adding things to a request for later use in views.
Rather than introduce potential compatibility issues with this code, we instead opted to add this mode so that all existing Django sync code runs in the same thread and thus is fully compatible with async mode. Note that sync code will always be in a different thread to any async code that is calling it, so you should avoid passing raw database handles or other thread-sensitive references around.
In practice this restriction means that you should not pass features of the
connection object when calling
sync_to_async(). Doing so will
trigger the thread safety checks:
# DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE=settings.py python -m asyncio >>> import asyncio >>> from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async >>> from django.db import connection >>> # In an async context so you cannot use the database directly: >>> connection.cursor() ... django.core.exceptions.SynchronousOnlyOperation: You cannot call this from an async context - use a thread or sync_to_async. >>> # Nor can you pass resolved connection attributes across threads: >>> await sync_to_async(connection.cursor)() ... django.db.utils.DatabaseError: DatabaseWrapper objects created in a thread can only be used in that same thread. The object with alias 'default' was created in thread id 4371465600 and this is thread id 6131478528.
Rather, you should encapsulate all database access within a helper function
that can be called with
sync_to_async() without relying on the connection
object in the calling code.